<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bloggers, don&#8217;t truncate your posts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/2007/04/bloggers-dont-truncate-your-posts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/2007/04/bloggers-dont-truncate-your-posts/</link>
	<description>Commentary on media, technology, marketing and clamming strategies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:36:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Underhill</title>
		<link>http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/2007/04/bloggers-dont-truncate-your-posts/comment-page-1/#comment-787597</link>
		<dc:creator>David Underhill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 22:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/?p=1131#comment-787597</guid>
		<description>I was trying to figure out why the feeds weren&#039;t full text.  I&#039;ve updated my syndication option now :).  Thanks David!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was trying to figure out why the feeds weren&#8217;t full text.  I&#8217;ve updated my syndication option now <img src='http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .  Thanks David!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick&#8217;s Ruminations: Full Feeds &#124; Gaming and Sports Betting Tips</title>
		<link>http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/2007/04/bloggers-dont-truncate-your-posts/comment-page-1/#comment-225103</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick&#8217;s Ruminations: Full Feeds &#124; Gaming and Sports Betting Tips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 09:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/?p=1131#comment-225103</guid>
		<description>[...] David Churbuck&#8217;s recent post imploring bloggers to publish full feeds reminded me that I&#8217;ve been meaning to comment on this for a while. It&#8217;s a subject I speak on regularly at SES, and some of the recommendations I make are not the same ones you see made on a number of blogs. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] David Churbuck&#8217;s recent post imploring bloggers to publish full feeds reminded me that I&#8217;ve been meaning to comment on this for a while. It&#8217;s a subject I speak on regularly at SES, and some of the recommendations I make are not the same ones you see made on a number of blogs. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Test Blog &#187; Rick&#8217;s Ruminations: Full Feeds</title>
		<link>http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/2007/04/bloggers-dont-truncate-your-posts/comment-page-1/#comment-214271</link>
		<dc:creator>Test Blog &#187; Rick&#8217;s Ruminations: Full Feeds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 15:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/?p=1131#comment-214271</guid>
		<description>[...] David Churbuck&#8217;s recent post imploring bloggers to publish full feeds reminded me that I&#8217;ve been meaning to comment on this for a while. It&#8217;s a subject I speak on regularly at SES, and some of the recommendations I make are not the same ones you see made on a number of blogs. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] David Churbuck&#8217;s recent post imploring bloggers to publish full feeds reminded me that I&#8217;ve been meaning to comment on this for a while. It&#8217;s a subject I speak on regularly at SES, and some of the recommendations I make are not the same ones you see made on a number of blogs. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Movie Library &#187; Blog Archive WiederkÃƒÂ¤uen Ricks: Volle Zufuhren</title>
		<link>http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/2007/04/bloggers-dont-truncate-your-posts/comment-page-1/#comment-206961</link>
		<dc:creator>Movie Library &#187; Blog Archive WiederkÃƒÂ¤uen Ricks: Volle Zufuhren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 02:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/?p=1131#comment-206961</guid>
		<description>[...] David Churbucks neuer Pfosten die anflehenden bloggers, zum der vollen Zufuhren zu verÃƒÂ¶ffentlichen erinnerten mich, daÃƒÅ¸ ich die Bedeutung gewesen bin, zum dieses fÃƒÂ¼r eine Weile zu kommentieren. Es ist ein Thema, das ich an regelmÃƒÂ¤ÃƒÅ¸ig an SES spreche, und einige der Empfehlungen ich bilde, sind nicht dieselben eine Sie gebildet auf einer Anzahl von blogs sehen. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] David Churbucks neuer Pfosten die anflehenden bloggers, zum der vollen Zufuhren zu verÃƒÂ¶ffentlichen erinnerten mich, daÃƒÅ¸ ich die Bedeutung gewesen bin, zum dieses fÃƒÂ¼r eine Weile zu kommentieren. Es ist ein Thema, das ich an regelmÃƒÂ¤ÃƒÅ¸ig an SES spreche, und einige der Empfehlungen ich bilde, sind nicht dieselben eine Sie gebildet auf einer Anzahl von blogs sehen. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: that canadian girl &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Full vs partial RSS feeds</title>
		<link>http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/2007/04/bloggers-dont-truncate-your-posts/comment-page-1/#comment-95366</link>
		<dc:creator>that canadian girl &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Full vs partial RSS feeds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 16:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/?p=1131#comment-95366</guid>
		<description>[...] David Churbuck points out that full feeds are also beneficial to Chinese readers, who may be able to read the RSS excerpt but not read the full entry on wordpress.com, for example. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] David Churbuck points out that full feeds are also beneficial to Chinese readers, who may be able to read the RSS excerpt but not read the full entry on wordpress.com, for example. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Tatum</title>
		<link>http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/2007/04/bloggers-dont-truncate-your-posts/comment-page-1/#comment-93525</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Tatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/?p=1131#comment-93525</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget that not all feed readers will show you the full feed when the summary is present along with the full-feed CDATA info (at least, that&#039;s how I understand it given my experience attempting to deliver a full feed).

Further, WordPress 2.1  out of the box will attempt to truncate every feed item that uses the &lt;!-- more --&gt; tag.

The solution I found to resolve this issue and deliver true full-text feeds was to use the following plug-in:

&lt;blockquote&gt;CompleteRSS 1.0 from NeoSmart Technologies&lt;a href=&quot;http://neosmart.net/dl.php?id=2&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://neosmart.net/dl.php?id=2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You may find other plug-ins that work similarly and YMMV. But it&#039;s been a real boon for me!

Regards,

Rich
&lt;a href=&quot;http://tatumweb.com/blog/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;BlogRodent&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget that not all feed readers will show you the full feed when the summary is present along with the full-feed CDATA info (at least, that&#8217;s how I understand it given my experience attempting to deliver a full feed).</p>
<p>Further, WordPress 2.1  out of the box will attempt to truncate every feed item that uses the &lt;!&#8211; more &#8211;&gt; tag.</p>
<p>The solution I found to resolve this issue and deliver true full-text feeds was to use the following plug-in:</p>
<blockquote><p>CompleteRSS 1.0 from NeoSmart Technologies<a href="http://neosmart.net/dl.php?id=2" rel="nofollow">http://neosmart.net/dl.php?id=2</a></p></blockquote>
<p>You may find other plug-ins that work similarly and YMMV. But it&#8217;s been a real boon for me!</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Rich<br />
<a href="http://tatumweb.com/blog/" rel="nofollow">BlogRodent</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet Business Blog &#187; Should You Use Partial Feeds To Increase Website Visitors?</title>
		<link>http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/2007/04/bloggers-dont-truncate-your-posts/comment-page-1/#comment-91044</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet Business Blog &#187; Should You Use Partial Feeds To Increase Website Visitors?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/?p=1131#comment-91044</guid>
		<description>[...] One popular reasons given for using partial feeds as opposed to full feeds is that it increases website visitors. If you let people have your full feed they will just consume your content through a feed reader and never visit your site, so you have to offer just a partial feed so they will have to click through to your website and read your full post, right? &#8230; Wrong! Several recent posts say otherwise. Whenever I subscribe to a feed and find out it only offers a partial feed I unsubscribe immediately in almost all cases. On the rare occasion that I do stay subscribed I end up reading less of the content than I would have had they offered a full feed, simply because clicking through to a website is just an extra step that I am reluctant to take, because it takes me away from all the other good content in my feed reader provided by all the other blogs who let me subscribe to a full feed. There is a lot of good content out there and I am always looking for ways to sift through it all. By offering only a partial feed you are pretty much guaranteeing that I will place your content in the never return category. One exception to this is Aaron Wall&#8217;s SEOBook. He offers great content that I wouldn&#8217;t want to miss it, but his blog is the only exception. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] One popular reasons given for using partial feeds as opposed to full feeds is that it increases website visitors. If you let people have your full feed they will just consume your content through a feed reader and never visit your site, so you have to offer just a partial feed so they will have to click through to your website and read your full post, right? &#8230; Wrong! Several recent posts say otherwise. Whenever I subscribe to a feed and find out it only offers a partial feed I unsubscribe immediately in almost all cases. On the rare occasion that I do stay subscribed I end up reading less of the content than I would have had they offered a full feed, simply because clicking through to a website is just an extra step that I am reluctant to take, because it takes me away from all the other good content in my feed reader provided by all the other blogs who let me subscribe to a full feed. There is a lot of good content out there and I am always looking for ways to sift through it all. By offering only a partial feed you are pretty much guaranteeing that I will place your content in the never return category. One exception to this is Aaron Wall&#8217;s SEOBook. He offers great content that I wouldn&#8217;t want to miss it, but his blog is the only exception. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ps3mate &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rick&#8217;s Ruminations: Full Feeds</title>
		<link>http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/2007/04/bloggers-dont-truncate-your-posts/comment-page-1/#comment-87565</link>
		<dc:creator>ps3mate &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rick&#8217;s Ruminations: Full Feeds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 02:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/?p=1131#comment-87565</guid>
		<description>[...] David Churbuck&#8217;s recent post imploring bloggers to publish full feeds reminded me that I&#8217;ve been meaning to comment on this for a while. It&#8217;s a subject I speak on regularly at SES, and some of the recommendations I make are not the same ones you see made on a number of blogs. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] David Churbuck&#8217;s recent post imploring bloggers to publish full feeds reminded me that I&#8217;ve been meaning to comment on this for a while. It&#8217;s a subject I speak on regularly at SES, and some of the recommendations I make are not the same ones you see made on a number of blogs. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Slater</title>
		<link>http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/2007/04/bloggers-dont-truncate-your-posts/comment-page-1/#comment-82453</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Slater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 19:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/?p=1131#comment-82453</guid>
		<description>Serves you right for calling me out! [Insert here: something like a smiley face, only cooler.] Okay, I confess my relative ignorance of wordpress controls. Will tinker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serves you right for calling me out! [Insert here: something like a smiley face, only cooler.] Okay, I confess my relative ignorance of wordpress controls. Will tinker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: site admin</title>
		<link>http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/2007/04/bloggers-dont-truncate-your-posts/comment-page-1/#comment-82058</link>
		<dc:creator>site admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 22:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/?p=1131#comment-82058</guid>
		<description>And I suspect you aren&#039;t inside of China either.....
Duh factor is huge here today in Churbuck-world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I suspect you aren&#8217;t inside of China either&#8230;..<br />
Duh factor is huge here today in Churbuck-world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

