<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marketing In A Down Market &#8211; Forbes.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/2008/01/marketing-in-a-down-market-forbescom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/2008/01/marketing-in-a-down-market-forbescom/</link>
	<description>Commentary on media, technology, marketing and clamming strategies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:36:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric j henderson</title>
		<link>http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/2008/01/marketing-in-a-down-market-forbescom/comment-page-1/#comment-281039</link>
		<dc:creator>eric j henderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 07:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/?p=1534#comment-281039</guid>
		<description>Wonder if accountable media can shoulder that load, not in terms of supply, but rather in terms of performance.  The author already noted that it doesn&#039;t necessarily perform better, but what if we go a step further and consider the possiblity of both overt and opportunity costs being too high in the medium to long term if accountable media doesn&#039;t achieve attractive ROI ratios on larger scale. Even with nominal preference of accountable media, I can still imagine the inventory only seeing a small, very short-lived contraction (based on news and suggestions like those of the author) as people suspect that the replicable ROI can&#039;t be scaled to enough $$.  Then it&#039;s back to sq. one (or, two, rather.)  But, I guess, if it&#039;s a matter of hunker-down defense, it may be a way to weather.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonder if accountable media can shoulder that load, not in terms of supply, but rather in terms of performance.  The author already noted that it doesn&#8217;t necessarily perform better, but what if we go a step further and consider the possiblity of both overt and opportunity costs being too high in the medium to long term if accountable media doesn&#8217;t achieve attractive ROI ratios on larger scale. Even with nominal preference of accountable media, I can still imagine the inventory only seeing a small, very short-lived contraction (based on news and suggestions like those of the author) as people suspect that the replicable ROI can&#8217;t be scaled to enough $$.  Then it&#8217;s back to sq. one (or, two, rather.)  But, I guess, if it&#8217;s a matter of hunker-down defense, it may be a way to weather.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monday Morning Reader &#171; Scattered Brilliance</title>
		<link>http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/2008/01/marketing-in-a-down-market-forbescom/comment-page-1/#comment-280611</link>
		<dc:creator>Monday Morning Reader &#171; Scattered Brilliance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/?p=1534#comment-280611</guid>
		<description>[...] David Churbuck references an article from Forbes.com that talks about marketing during a recession. 5. Shift media spending to accountable media. Not because they necessarily perform better, but because investment in them can be justified in terms of return on investment. A heavy bias toward accountable spending is the best way to protect marketing budgets from profit-starved CFOs. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] David Churbuck references an article from Forbes.com that talks about marketing during a recession. 5. Shift media spending to accountable media. Not because they necessarily perform better, but because investment in them can be justified in terms of return on investment. A heavy bias toward accountable spending is the best way to protect marketing budgets from profit-starved CFOs. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

