<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GoogleTV â€“ the 30-second spot ainâ€™t dead yet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/2008/02/googletv-%e2%80%93-the-30-second-spot-ain%e2%80%99t-dead-yet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/2008/02/googletv-%e2%80%93-the-30-second-spot-ain%e2%80%99t-dead-yet/</link>
	<description>Commentary on media, technology, marketing and clamming strategies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:46:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim Forbes</title>
		<link>http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/2008/02/googletv-%e2%80%93-the-30-second-spot-ain%e2%80%99t-dead-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-289459</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Forbes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 19:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/?p=1550#comment-289459</guid>
		<description>you said: &quot;Well, I donâ€™t have a Dick Tracy Video Phone Watch either.&quot;

David. I do. I got mine from Microsoft at Demo. For the record. it&#039;s a piece of shit.

you win the &quot;Best business post of 2008: for this well written blog entry.

Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you said: &#8220;Well, I donâ€™t have a Dick Tracy Video Phone Watch either.&#8221;</p>
<p>David. I do. I got mine from Microsoft at Demo. For the record. it&#8217;s a piece of shit.</p>
<p>you win the &#8220;Best business post of 2008: for this well written blog entry.</p>
<p>Jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric henderson</title>
		<link>http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/2008/02/googletv-%e2%80%93-the-30-second-spot-ain%e2%80%99t-dead-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-288964</link>
		<dc:creator>eric henderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 00:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/?p=1550#comment-288964</guid>
		<description>&quot;Google was able to measure, through its analytic integration with Dishâ€™s set-top box infrastructure, that over 90 percent of the ads were viewed to their full 30-second conclusion.&quot;  

That&#039;s the core - not just ability to measure but the return to a simple matter of really knowing what one pays for.  The measurement will be refined quickly (at somewhere between Moore&#039;s and Kurzweil&#039;s speed?).  But once the tv is 100% digital, no need for statistical extrapolations of nielsens.  

That might look like a &quot;media dry goods store.&quot;  Popular shows will probably still command a chunk, but the new work will be the buying not of the shows we know, but rather the buying of populations that watch ads on shows that may not be in the top whatever...  Digging even out into the outlier end to find value ratios that make sense.

Will be interesting to see what this does to content, buying, agencies, etc. and what new set of marketing challenges will come.

I think one new agency challenge will be that of re-orienting targeting.  &quot;Confirmation of delivery&quot; should put more pressure on the research, assumptions, and models that led to a given target or estimation of that target&#039;s response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Google was able to measure, through its analytic integration with Dishâ€™s set-top box infrastructure, that over 90 percent of the ads were viewed to their full 30-second conclusion.&#8221;  </p>
<p>That&#8217;s the core &#8211; not just ability to measure but the return to a simple matter of really knowing what one pays for.  The measurement will be refined quickly (at somewhere between Moore&#8217;s and Kurzweil&#8217;s speed?).  But once the tv is 100% digital, no need for statistical extrapolations of nielsens.  </p>
<p>That might look like a &#8220;media dry goods store.&#8221;  Popular shows will probably still command a chunk, but the new work will be the buying not of the shows we know, but rather the buying of populations that watch ads on shows that may not be in the top whatever&#8230;  Digging even out into the outlier end to find value ratios that make sense.</p>
<p>Will be interesting to see what this does to content, buying, agencies, etc. and what new set of marketing challenges will come.</p>
<p>I think one new agency challenge will be that of re-orienting targeting.  &#8220;Confirmation of delivery&#8221; should put more pressure on the research, assumptions, and models that led to a given target or estimation of that target&#8217;s response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
