<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The stupidity of metrics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/2008/03/the-stupidity-of-metrics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/2008/03/the-stupidity-of-metrics/</link>
	<description>Commentary on media, technology, marketing and clamming strategies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:36:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Turning News Into Knowledge &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Good Media Analysis is Both Statistical and Empirical</title>
		<link>http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/2008/03/the-stupidity-of-metrics/comment-page-1/#comment-335647</link>
		<dc:creator>Turning News Into Knowledge &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Good Media Analysis is Both Statistical and Empirical</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 02:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/?p=1580#comment-335647</guid>
		<description>[...] In his blog posting, The stupidity of metrics, David Churbuck takes issue with the practice of measurement. More specifically, the practice of trying to measure subjective information. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In his blog posting, The stupidity of metrics, David Churbuck takes issue with the practice of measurement. More specifically, the practice of trying to measure subjective information. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Turning News Into Knowledge &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Good Media Analysis is Both Statistical and Empirical</title>
		<link>http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/2008/03/the-stupidity-of-metrics/comment-page-1/#comment-335646</link>
		<dc:creator>Turning News Into Knowledge &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Good Media Analysis is Both Statistical and Empirical</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 02:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/?p=1580#comment-335646</guid>
		<description>[...] In his blog posting, The stupidity of metrics, David Churbuck takes issue with the practice of measurement. More specifically, the practice of trying to measure subjective information. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In his blog posting, The stupidity of metrics, David Churbuck takes issue with the practice of measurement. More specifically, the practice of trying to measure subjective information. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Turning News Into Knowledge &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Good Media Analysis is Both Statistical and Empirical</title>
		<link>http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/2008/03/the-stupidity-of-metrics/comment-page-1/#comment-335645</link>
		<dc:creator>Turning News Into Knowledge &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Good Media Analysis is Both Statistical and Empirical</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 02:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/?p=1580#comment-335645</guid>
		<description>[...] In his blog posting, The stupidity of metrics, David Churbuck takes issue with the practice of measurement. More specifically, the practice of trying to measure subjective information. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In his blog posting, The stupidity of metrics, David Churbuck takes issue with the practice of measurement. More specifically, the practice of trying to measure subjective information. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Churbuck</title>
		<link>http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/2008/03/the-stupidity-of-metrics/comment-page-1/#comment-333573</link>
		<dc:creator>David Churbuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 22:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/?p=1580#comment-333573</guid>
		<description>Oh god preserve me from copyeditors and proofreaders ....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh god preserve me from copyeditors and proofreaders &#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pde</title>
		<link>http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/2008/03/the-stupidity-of-metrics/comment-page-1/#comment-333457</link>
		<dc:creator>pde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 20:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/?p=1580#comment-333457</guid>
		<description>Spelling flames are lame, but the irony of this sentence is deep:

&quot;Those unmeasurable intangibles are dismissed by technocrats as â€œfeelingâ€ behavior prized by people to sloppy to appreciate precision.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spelling flames are lame, but the irony of this sentence is deep:</p>
<p>&#8220;Those unmeasurable intangibles are dismissed by technocrats as â€œfeelingâ€ behavior prized by people to sloppy to appreciate precision.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Coleman</title>
		<link>http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/2008/03/the-stupidity-of-metrics/comment-page-1/#comment-312112</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Coleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 14:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/?p=1580#comment-312112</guid>
		<description>A minor quibble:

Subjectivity is not the measurement of quality.  It is the measurement of beauty, sometimes referred to as aesthetics.  Quality encompasses both the subjective and the objective.  Objective qualities are facts; Subjective qualities are impressions.  To properly distinguish between good and bad one must take into account both the objective and the subjective.

See &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/Zen-Art-Motorcycle-Maintenance-Inquiry/dp/0060589469/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance&lt;/a&gt; by Robert Pirsig</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A minor quibble:</p>
<p>Subjectivity is not the measurement of quality.  It is the measurement of beauty, sometimes referred to as aesthetics.  Quality encompasses both the subjective and the objective.  Objective qualities are facts; Subjective qualities are impressions.  To properly distinguish between good and bad one must take into account both the objective and the subjective.</p>
<p>See <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Zen-Art-Motorcycle-Maintenance-Inquiry/dp/0060589469/" rel="nofollow">Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance</a> by Robert Pirsig</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean&#8217;s Mental Walkabout &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2008-03-09</title>
		<link>http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/2008/03/the-stupidity-of-metrics/comment-page-1/#comment-311784</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean&#8217;s Mental Walkabout &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2008-03-09</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 04:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/?p=1580#comment-311784</guid>
		<description>[...] The stupidity of metrics at Churbuck.com Dead on. (tags: metrics work) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The stupidity of metrics at Churbuck.com Dead on. (tags: metrics work) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa --</title>
		<link>http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/2008/03/the-stupidity-of-metrics/comment-page-1/#comment-311283</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa --</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 15:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/?p=1580#comment-311283</guid>
		<description>I fear we are about to tip into TPS hell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fear we are about to tip into TPS hell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tecosystems &#187; links for 2008-03-08</title>
		<link>http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/2008/03/the-stupidity-of-metrics/comment-page-1/#comment-310914</link>
		<dc:creator>tecosystems &#187; links for 2008-03-08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 05:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/?p=1580#comment-310914</guid>
		<description>[...] The stupidity of metrics at Churbuck.com yup (tags: metrics focus tunnelvision davidchurbuck) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The stupidity of metrics at Churbuck.com yup (tags: metrics focus tunnelvision davidchurbuck) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Leonard</title>
		<link>http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/2008/03/the-stupidity-of-metrics/comment-page-1/#comment-310867</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Leonard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 04:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/?p=1580#comment-310867</guid>
		<description>Measurements should have a lifetime. Early in their creation there is a time where the measurement needs to be optimized so that a business decision can be made from the facts. As soon as possible it should transform from a report to a programed action where the business response is initiated. 

The first cars require a mechanic to sit in the car an constantly make adjustment depending upon the situation and how long the car was on the road. We donâ€™t need that now because all those activities are now part of the cars system. It allows us to focus on what is really important and as a result we can go faster, safer, and with more reliability.

The same goes for business measurements. When they are dealing with a new business environment or situation we need the measurements to understand what choices to make and directions to take, but as soon as we learn from then we should be able to â€œprogramâ€ our business activities and get back to the imaginative and creative aspects of business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Measurements should have a lifetime. Early in their creation there is a time where the measurement needs to be optimized so that a business decision can be made from the facts. As soon as possible it should transform from a report to a programed action where the business response is initiated. </p>
<p>The first cars require a mechanic to sit in the car an constantly make adjustment depending upon the situation and how long the car was on the road. We donâ€™t need that now because all those activities are now part of the cars system. It allows us to focus on what is really important and as a result we can go faster, safer, and with more reliability.</p>
<p>The same goes for business measurements. When they are dealing with a new business environment or situation we need the measurements to understand what choices to make and directions to take, but as soon as we learn from then we should be able to â€œprogramâ€ our business activities and get back to the imaginative and creative aspects of business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

