Oct 02 2008
Do it yourself color commentary
Last night’s first game of the American League division championship between the Red Sox and the Angels was a classic post-season game that began at 10 pm and ended around 1:30 am, insuring that I only got two-third of my required allotment of sleep. Today will be a long one.
Following the Game through Twitter and the “#redsox” hash tag (twitter is a 140-character “microblogging” system, think of it as open instant messaging) was an unrewarding experience. Keeping an eye on the laptop and an eye on the television made me miss some important plays, and none of the tweets, or comments, were particularly insightful or hysterically funny.
I’d rather read a live blog account from Red and Denton at Surviving Grady, or hang out with a bunch of smartass friends at a local dive, get messy, and call in sick the next day. The virtual bar of #redsox, while occasionally funny, had just enough lag to make it unfun. Then the volume of baseball chatter overwhelmed the usual Twitter torrent of Palin and Obama talk and the system started to lag. By midnight on the east coast, the Red Sox was dominating the Twitter buzz, but the content was … well, making fun of the color of one guy’s salmon colored sport coat, simultaneously cheering good catches and homeruns, and making fun of television ads for Viagra.
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Delicious
Youtube
Flickr
GooglePlus
It did have one good side: it brought to light the need for the ability to exclude subjects by hash tag. Such as the #pol tag or the #redsox tag.
I completely agree. Early on my daughter wanted to tweet a “go red sox let’s go” and I let her. It might have been one of the more intelligent tweets of the night.
[...] of potential models. Also worth watching is the hash function, where you can tag any topic (IE #redsox, as Churbuck pointed out). This function is not likely to catch on with my mother (I can’t imagine her adding hashes to her [...]
are tweets on bivalve harvests “clammentary?”
Inmquiring minds want to know
jmf