<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do it yourself color commentary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/2008/10/do-it-yourself-color-commentary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/2008/10/do-it-yourself-color-commentary/</link>
	<description>Commentary on media, technology, marketing and clamming strategies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:36:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim Forbes</title>
		<link>http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/2008/10/do-it-yourself-color-commentary/comment-page-1/#comment-637270</link>
		<dc:creator>jim Forbes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 20:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/?p=2181#comment-637270</guid>
		<description>are tweets on bivalve harvests &quot;clammentary?&quot;
Inmquiring minds want  to know

jmf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>are tweets on bivalve harvests &#8220;clammentary?&#8221;<br />
Inmquiring minds want  to know</p>
<p>jmf</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TweetSense &#124; Write a Blog Site</title>
		<link>http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/2008/10/do-it-yourself-color-commentary/comment-page-1/#comment-636735</link>
		<dc:creator>TweetSense &#124; Write a Blog Site</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 21:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/?p=2181#comment-636735</guid>
		<description>[...] of potential models.  Also worth watching is the hash function, where you can tag any topic (IE #redsox, as Churbuck pointed out). This function is not likely to catch on with my mother (I can&#039;t imagine her adding hashes to her [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of potential models.  Also worth watching is the hash function, where you can tag any topic (IE #redsox, as Churbuck pointed out). This function is not likely to catch on with my mother (I can&#8217;t imagine her adding hashes to her [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Cahill</title>
		<link>http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/2008/10/do-it-yourself-color-commentary/comment-page-1/#comment-636499</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Cahill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 13:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/?p=2181#comment-636499</guid>
		<description>It did have one good side: it brought to light the need for the ability to exclude subjects by hash tag.  Such as the #pol tag or the #redsox tag.  

I completely agree.  Early on my daughter wanted to tweet a &quot;go red sox let&#039;s go&quot; and I let her.  It might have been one of the more intelligent tweets of the night.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It did have one good side: it brought to light the need for the ability to exclude subjects by hash tag.  Such as the #pol tag or the #redsox tag.  </p>
<p>I completely agree.  Early on my daughter wanted to tweet a &#8220;go red sox let&#8217;s go&#8221; and I let her.  It might have been one of the more intelligent tweets of the night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

